The Department of Energy (DOE), wants you to believe that somehow, the new designs for nuclear power plants are “advanced” technology. Don’t you believe them. “Advanced Nuclear,” and “Small Modular Reactors” are nothing more than the same old stuff in a shiny new bag. These “new” reactors are dangerous and filthy. “Advanced Nuclear” is increasing the threat of nuclear terrorism, and contributing to the proliferation of more nuclear bombs.
Welcome to the Dark Age of nuclear energy
According to a June 4, 2026 press release, the DOE is “celebrating” the first “Mark-O” Advanced Nuclear “micro” Reactor after it achieved “criticality.” In the nuclear bomb and energy business, the term “critical” and “criticality” signify a sustained nuclear reaction.
“Criticality” can take the form of a bomb, as it did at Hiroshima on June 6, 1945, or it can take the form of a slow burn at a nuclear power plant, where the heat produced by the nuclear reaction is used to boil water to turn a turbine that generates electricity.
According to publicity, “The Mark-0 is the first of multiple advanced reactors anticipated to go critical by the July 4th deadline set by President Trump in his May 2025 executive order.”
Donald Trump’s “Bold Leadership”
According to U.S. Energy Secretary, and Trump sycophant, Chris Wright:
“It is fitting that on the eve of our nation’s 250th anniversary, we are witnessing a historic moment for American energy,” said Wright. “For the first time in more than four decades, a new privately developed non-light-water reactor has reached criticality in the United States. Thank you to President Trump for his bold leadership and thank you to the bold scientists and entrepreneurs at Antares and Idaho National Laboratory who helped make this moment possible. I look forward to seeing continued progress in the American nuclear renaissance.”
Advanced Nuclear isn’t a “renaissance”
It is a return to the Dark Ages of 20th Century when humans worshipped blindly at the altar of nuclear weapons and nuclear power.
According to this Congressional Report, there are scores of reasons why “Advanced Nuclear” is a bad idea.
1) It is the deadliest stuff on earth
Nuclear fuels, including “Spent Nuclear Fuel” are highly radioactive and deadly for thousands of human generations.
2) Nuclear weapons proliferation
Uranium and plutonium, which are produced and used in abundance by “Advanced Nuclear” are also the key components for nuclear warheads. For unstable nations that are seeking “First World” status, the acquisition of nuclear bombs and missiles is perceived as necessary step for ensuring equal footing with their enemies.
3) Terrorist threats
A nuclear power plant or nuclear waste repository are prime targets for terrorists. Terrorists can use weapons grade uranium or plutonium to make bombs or poison their enemies. In addition, every nuclear power plant and nuclear waste storage site is a potential target for terrorist seeking to turn a nuclear site into a massive dirty bomb.
4) Higher safety risk and lower quality control
Advanced reactors are harder to inspect and monitor for safety. Some of the designs are “cooled” by molten salt or molten metals, such as lead, which the industry is touting as “safer.” In this 2017 report, the International Atomic Energy Agency, which ironically promotes “Atoms for Peace,” said that some of the characteristics of advanced reactors make them difficult to monitor and safeguard.
5) Enriched fuels will enrich nuclear bomb builders
Highly enriched fuels create additional proliferation risks. HALEU reactors (High-Assay Low-Enriched Uranium), for example, require such highly enriched uranium, that the fuel can can be used to make nuclear bombs without further enrichment. HALEU enriched uranium is desirable for nuclear weapons merchants.
6) There will be a thriving nuclear black market
More “Advanced Nuclear” power plants will pave the way to a deadly nuclear waste black market. If US policy is to put “Advanced Nuclear” power plants into every city and neighborhood, it means that each power plant becomes a potential distribution center for weapons quality uranium and plutonium. Every single phase of the product cycle must be monitored to prevent theft. From uranium enrichment and fuel fabrication to ensuring safe transport, and also fuel reprocessing.
7) A powerful lure for criminals
Some advanced reactor technologies must rely on reprocessing and recycling to make them cost-effective. The refined weapons quality materials makes them irresistibly attractive to thieves who could build radiation dispersal bombs, or use the materials to make weapons.
Summary
Most of the low-enriched (3 to 5%) uranium fuel that is currently used in U.S. reactors cannot be used to make bombs without further enrichment. What’s more, the USA does not have commercial facilities for chemical separation of plutonium.
Nonetheless, as the table below shows, American corporations are lining up at the DOE trough for their share of billions of dollars in DOE money. Source: Congressional Report No R45706, 02/17/2023, Advanced Nuclear Reactors: Technology Overview and Current Issues.
Planned and Potential U.S. Advanced Reactor Demonstration Plants
Reactor Designer | Technology | Reactor Power (Electric) | Plant Owner | DOE Funding | DOE Cost Share | Plant Location | NRC Licensing Status |
Demonstrations with ARDP Funding | |||||||
Terra Power | Sodium-cooled fast reactor | 345 MW | PacifiCorp | Up to $2.0 billion | 50% | Kemmerer, WY | Pre-application activities |
X-energy | High-temperature gas-cooled reactor | 80 MW | Energy Northwest | Up to $1.2 billion | 50% | Washington | Pre-application activities |
Demonstrations with Other DOE Funding | |||||||
NuScale | Light water SMR | 77 MW | Utah Associated Municipal Power Systems | Up to $1.4 billion | 23% | INL | 77 MW standard design application submitted 1/1/2023 |
Pre-Demonstrations with ARDP Funding | |||||||
Westinghouse | Heat pipe micro-reactor | 5 MW | Westinghouse | Up to $7 million | 80% | Unspecified | Pre-application activities |
BWX Technologies | Commercial high-temperature gas-cooled micro-reactor | 17 MW | BWX Technologies | Up to $85 million | 80% | Unspecified | None |
Kairos | Fluoride-salt-cooled high-temperature test reactor | 35 MW thermal | Kairos | Up to $303 million | 48% | Oak Ridge, TN | Construction permit application submitted 9/29/2021 |
Holtec | Water-cooled SMR | 160 MW | Holtec | Up to $116 million | 79% | Unspecified | Pre-application activities |
Terra Power | Molten chloride fast reactor test facilities | Unspeci-fied | TerraPower | Up to $90 million | 80% | Everett, WA | Pre-application activities |
Prototype Funded by DOD | |||||||
BWX Technologies | Defense high-temperature gas-cooled micro-reactor | 1-5 MW | DOD | About $300 million | Funded by DOD | INL | DOE safety oversight |
Other Designs with NRC Interactions | |||||||
General Atomics | High-temperature gas-cooled fast reactor | 50 MW | Unspecified | No demonstration funding | None | Unspecified | Pre-application activities |
Terrestrial Energy | Molten salt reactor | 392 MW | Unspecified | No demonstration funding | None | Unspecified | Pre-application activities |
GE Hitachi | Water-cooled SMR | 300 MW | Ontario Power Generation | No demonstration funding | None | Clarington, Ontario | Pre-application activities by NRC and Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission |
Ultra Safe Nuclear Corporation | High-temperature gas-cooled micro-reactor | 15 MW thermal | University of Illinois | No demonstration funding | None | University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign | Pre-application activities |
Sources: DOE, NRC, Government Accountability Office, company websites, news accounts.
Note: Demonstration projects with announced DOE or DOD funding or with licensing application or pre-application activities listed on the NRC website. INL = Idaho National Laboratory. The planned TerraPower demonstration near Kemmerer, WY, is at the site of closing coal plant.